Ranking por Impact on the Relevance of Regulations, Administration, and Finance as Enablers in Training
Evaluates how policies, administration, and financial management support the program's operation, including quality certification and resource management efficiency.
Peso: 5.0%
Categoría: Administration
68.1
Promedio General
99.1
Puntuación Máxima68.1
Promedio53.3
Puntuación Mínima1503
UniversidadesRanking por Impact on the Relevance of Regulations, Administration, and Finance as Enablers in Training
Todos los Criterios
1
Imperial College London
United Kingdom
Public
99.1
puntos
2
University of Oxford
United Kingdom
Public
99.0
puntos
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
United States
Private not for Profit
98.9
puntos
4
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
Public
98.6
puntos
5
Stanford University
United States
Private not for Profit
98.0
puntos
6
UCL (University College London)
United Kingdom
Public
97.6
puntos
7
Harvard University
United States
Private not for Profit
97.6
puntos
8
Institut Polytechnique de Paris
France
Public
97.0
puntos
9
ETH Zurich (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology)
Switzerland
Public
96.2
puntos
10
National University of Singapore (NUS)
Singapore
Public
95.8
puntos
11
University of Chicago
United States
Private not for Profit
95.6
puntos
12
University of Pennsylvania
United States
Private not for Profit
95.5
puntos
13
The University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong SAR
Public
95.5
puntos
14
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)
Singapore
Public
95.2
puntos
15
PSL University
France
Public
95.2
puntos
16
Johns Hopkins University
United States
Private not for Profit
95.1
puntos
17
Yale University
United States
Private not for Profit
94.6
puntos
18
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Switzerland
Public
93.8
puntos
19
Kings College London (KCL)
United Kingdom
Public
93.6
puntos
20
California Institute of Technology (Caltech)
United States
Private not for Profit
93.4
puntos
21
Technical University of Munich
Germany
Public
93.3
puntos
22
University of Edinburgh
United Kingdom
Public
93.1
puntos
23
Columbia University
United States
Private not for Profit
93.1
puntos
24
McGill University
Canada
Public
92.7
puntos
25
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
Saudi Arabia
Public
92.6
puntos
26
Peking University
China (Mainland)
Public
92.3
puntos
27
The University of Manchester
United Kingdom
Public
92.0
puntos
28
The University of New South Wales
Australia
Public
92.0
puntos
29
Cornell University
United States
Private not for Profit
91.9
puntos
30
University of Toronto
Canada
Public
91.8
puntos
31
Northwestern University
United States
Private not for Profit
91.8
puntos
32
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong SAR
Public
91.4
puntos
33
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong SAR
Public
91.4
puntos
34
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor
United States
Public
91.1
puntos
35
The University of Melbourne
Australia
Public
91.0
puntos
36
Technical University of Denmark
Denmark
Public
91.0
puntos
37
Tsinghua University
China (Mainland)
Public
90.8
puntos
38
University of California, Berkeley (UCB)
United States
Public
90.7
puntos
39
Delft University of Technology
Netherlands
Public
90.7
puntos
40
Fudan University
China (Mainland)
Public
90.6
puntos
41
Australian National University
Australia
Public
90.4
puntos
42
City University of Hong Kong
Hong Kong SAR
Public
90.2
puntos
43
Université Paris-Saclay
France
Public
90.2
puntos
44
The University of Sydney
Australia
Public
90.2
puntos
45
Qatar University
Qatar
Public
90.2
puntos
46
New York University (NYU)
United States
Private not for Profit
90.0
puntos
47
Lund University
Sweden
Public
90.0
puntos
48
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Sweden
Public
89.8
puntos
49
Brown University
United States
Private not for Profit
89.5
puntos
50
Universiti Malaya (UM)
Malaysia
Public
89.4
puntos
Sobre este Criterio
Evaluates how policies, administration, and financial management support the program's operation, including quality certification and resource management efficiency.
Peso en el ranking:
5.0%
Categoría:
Administration