Evaluation Process
Learn about the rigorous 5-stage process we follow to evaluate universities in Latin America with the highest standards of quality and transparency.
5
Process Stages
Our Evaluation Process
The evaluation process of Grana Ranking Global is a rigorous and transparent system that ensures the objectivity and quality of our university rankings.
6-8 Months
Total Process Duration
50+ Experts
Evaluation Panel
1000+ Indicators
Data Points Analyzed
Process Stages
Each stage has specific objectives and rigorous quality criteria.
Data Collection
Systematic collection of official and verified information from participating universities through multiple reliable sources.
Main Activities:
- Review of applied methodology
- Validation of anomalous results
- Analysis of regional consistency
- Improvement recommendations
Quality Criteria:
- Updated information (maximum 2 years)
- Verifiable official sources
- Minimum data completeness of 80%
4-6 Weeks
Duration500+
Universities Contacted85%
Response RateValidation and Cleaning
Rigorous process of verifying the quality, consistency, and accuracy of all collected data.
Main Activities:
- Review of applied methodology
- Validation of anomalous results
- Analysis of regional consistency
- Improvement recommendations
Quality Controls:
- Anomaly detection algorithms
- Manual review by experts
- Statistical validation of ranges
3-4 Weeks
Duration15
Validation Experts95%
Data AccuracyCalculation and Analysis
Application of the Grana Ranking Global methodology to calculate scores and generate preliminary rankings.
Main Activities:
- Review of applied methodology
- Validation of anomalous results
- Analysis of regional consistency
- Improvement recommendations
Applied Methodology:
- 10 criteria with specific weightings
- Z-score normalization by indicator
- Final weighted aggregation
2-3 Weeks
Duration10
Evaluated Criteria100%
Weighted CoverageExpert Review
Independent validation of results by an international panel of academic experts specialized in higher education.
Main Activities:
- Review of applied methodology
- Validation of anomalous results
- Analysis of regional consistency
- Improvement recommendations
Expert Panel:
- University rectors and vice-rectors
- Researchers in higher education
- Specialists in academic evaluation
3-4 Weeks
Duration25
Review Experts20
Countries RepresentedPublication and Dissemination
Preparation and official release of the ranking results with complete and transparent documentation.
Main Activities:
- Preparation of detailed reports
- Creation of communication materials
- Launch on web platform
- Press conferences and presentations
Deliverables:
- Complete ranking by categories
- Detailed methodological report
- Analysis of regional trends
2-3 Weeks
Duration500+
Ranked Universities100%
TransparencyAnnual Schedule
Metodologia.cronograma_anual_texto
Start of the Cycle
Launch of the call for applications and opening of registration
Data Collection
Sending of questionnaires and collection of information
Validation
Verification and cleaning of data
Calculation
Application of methodology and calculation of rankings
Review
Review of results and necessary adjustments
Publication
Official launch of results
Quality Guarantees
Our commitment to excellence is reflected in every stage of the process.
Triple Verification
Each data point goes through three levels of independent verification.
Independent Panel
External experts without conflicts of interest validate results
Total Transparency
Methodology and data are completely open to public scrutiny.
Continuous Improvement
Annual review of the process based on feedback.